Author: Geoff Lane
Date: 16:42:20 10/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2003 at 13:11:44, Chessfun wrote: >On October 31, 2003 at 11:20:18, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On October 31, 2003 at 10:58:01, Francesco Di Tolla wrote: >> >>>This is nonsense: if a program requires to be tested manually due to the lack of >>>any interoperability protocol, then I prefer to see CM in ChessBase gui with a >>>different book rather than no test at all. >>>But since it appears that the CM book can be converted I see no need to discuss >>>further. >>>Just convert it and switch learning off. >> >>It can't be that difficult to comprehend the idea behind SSDF, ie. testing >>commercial products as they appear to the customer. It isn't the strongest >>possible configuration by popular opinion or preference. Both are irrelevant. In >>some cases, however, testing can be difficult or impossible. Sometimes a >>compromise is possible as long as it doesn't distort performance of the product >>in question. How isn't crucial if the setup offers little or no distortion, >>which is the gist of the paragraph you commented on. No nonsense in sight. >> >>If The King can be tested with a converted CM9K book and Nalimov EGTB, I suppose >>the distortion would be minimal. Can CM9K books be converted or was it only true >>for CM8K and older? > >CM9K books cannot be converted to other usable formats. http://www.chess-archive.com/ccc.php?art_id=313052 > >Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.