Author: Brian Kostick
Date: 12:52:41 11/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2003 at 15:29:09, Christophe Theron wrote: >On November 01, 2003 at 11:14:26, Brian Kostick wrote: > >>On October 31, 2003 at 13:03:23, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On October 31, 2003 at 12:55:37, Brian Kostick wrote: >>> >>>>I do not see this situation the same as competing for a tounament title. >Someone will always be around to complain about 'unfair' in context where it >>>>has little point. We certainly EXPECT it in chess. Better to work on your >>>>engines and play chess. Save the concerns for tournament and let the SSDF do >>>>whatever it is they do. BK >>> >>>The concern is to determine what the SSDF is doing and why they change >>>their rules depending on whom they're talking to. >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >> >>Why do some people have to determine anothers private business? > > > >Because it is our business, precisely. Not in the sense of "making money". >That's not the problem. > >We (chess programmers) in majority view the SSDF list as a kind of >super-tournament, and actually the most reliable tournament ever played in the >whole universe. > >So it's our business when the rules are changed to advantage one competitor. > >Actually it's more our business than yours, but it's yours also if you are even >only remotely interested in computer chess. > > > > >> I do not know SSDF rules > > > >That's what I guessed from your comments. > >So maybe after all it's definitely more our business than yours. Maybe YOU don't >care, but WE care. > > > > Christophe > > > > > >> but I know a willow will bend when a strong wind blows. BK Maybe it's you who is not current with it's rules and regulations? How else can they do this shocking thing! People here getting all stirred up about a question that can only be answered by SSDF. Seems to me those who really want an answer will write to SSDF. Posting things like this here are just to stir people up. What happens if SSDF has a rule that says 'We may act arbitrarily'. Then would you an GCP be satisfied? BK
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.