Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:37:40 11/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2003 at 16:48:12, Joachim Rang wrote: >On October 31, 2003 at 16:35:42, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On October 31, 2003 at 16:25:10, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>Of course a book is important, but the choice of general.ctg is perfect since >>>it is neither a very bad nor a superb book. Don't you agree? >>> >>>Of course there might be questions of Principles, but from a practical approach >>>it's the best decision from the SSDF. >> >>It's a horrible decision also for pratical reasons because you don't get >>the Fritz book with ChessMaster. And certainly no the the interface (learner) >>either. >> >>-- >>GCP > >these two facts are minor in my opinion. You get another probably not terribly >weaker opening book instead and the learning function is only important for >rating lists and maybe even for that not very much. > >regards Joachim > >P.S.: We really should wait until the new SSDF-list is out. CM9000SKR will not >be in the Top5, so I don't think it will have much influence to the selling of >Ubisoft. What if someone shows that in particular openings, CM would repeat the same moves and lose the same games over and over. But with the CB GUI, which does the learning for it, it doesn't repeat the openings and does much better. Is that a function of Chessmaster's play? Or the GUI's opening selection and learning. It is way too fuzzy and imprecise, IMHO. This entire idea about sharing books or book authors has more holes than a mall full of Swiss Cheese.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.