Author: Joe T. Pangilinan
Date: 07:36:43 11/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 1998 at 08:27:06, Micheal Cummings wrote: >I can understand your situation, but you put out a list in which alot of >programmers refer to on their web sites for their chess programs to show how >strong their programs are compared to the other programs on the market. > >I have also seen SSDF referred to in magazines when chess programs are >advertised. But personally even knowing your situation after you explained it, I >would be unhappy knowing that I am puttng out a list knowing that the rankings >are incomplete. > >It is just like me going and selecting programs that fit my criteria and saying, >"okay this program I rank as the best, with the criteria I set". > >Yes SSDF does a great job in what they have, but I am just sad that there is no >way to get some sort of indication of ranking for this program on your list. > >If I had the time I would try and get a few games played manually with >chessmaster and send them in, but alas I do not. > >It is just an unfortunate situation that chessmaster can pull of some great >games and we can post them and say wow what a move or game, and in the end we >are still blind as to how it rates against other programs. > >All round it is sad that SSDF cannot get a ranking for this program and that >Mindscape will not put and autoplayer into the program. > I wonder if Johan considered porting his King 2.66 Engine to the Fritz GUI. That will be a killer combo, and who knows, it might be a big seller! >Regards > >Micheal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.