Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 13:45:02 11/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2003 at 13:45:53, Rajen Gupta wrote: >all authors of opening books as well as the respective engine programmers claim >that the ob is part and parcel of the chess package and the engine can only >function at its best if it uses its own optimised opening books; this has been >shouted from the rooftops for years > >(if one belives this theory then then the KING SKR is at a significant >disadvantage as it is using a non optimised opening; furthermore one that is >relatively old;) > >now the same programmers who for years have claimed the above are stating the >exact opposite that for some reason the kingSKR will get an advantage if it uses >another engines opening books which in fact is non optimised for the KING!! > >(as far as i know the general.ctg is a non-optimised powerbook which is a >general book not optimised for a particular engine so it should be allowed to be >used with the king any way) > >let us therefore test both engines with the same opening books; either another >engines borrowed opening book (which will be optimised for neither engine such >as the fritz.ctg when shredder plays theKing) or something like draw.ctg or the >lunsen book or a power book) this will ensure a level playing field and equal >disadvantages for both engines > >that is the only equiatble solution that i can think of given the contraints in >this situation I really don't understand all the conversation about this matter. What exactly is not clear about "SSDF tested chess products a customer can buy/download for free, with either the default settings or the ones the programmer suggests"? Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.