Author: odell hall
Date: 08:33:23 11/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 1998 at 06:48:14, Mark Young wrote: >On November 11, 1998 at 06:25:36, Mark Young wrote: > >>sorry I see the hash size now, 16mb. I will recheck with that size. > > >Now it plays your rebel 10 moves when set to 13mb hash and 10 mb hash. At lower >hash size it plays like my Rebel 10 set at 120mb hash. Try this, play the same >opening but set rebel 10 at 8 mb hash, and see if you still can win. ??? I don't understand the logic. Are you saying by lowering my hash table size than I will get the same performance of your 125mb hash? Anyway i will try this. I have asked the questions many times on this message board about how hash tables affect the performance of chess programs without a satifactory answer. I guess I will have to experiment on my own to answer this question. I always assumed that hash tables made little difference with rebel. Don't get me wrong my rebel is still playing bull strong because i have won only one game in 50!! , but it just surprised me that I even one 1 game. Since I was unable to win on my 486. Once in three years, I expected that since i upgraded to the 233, I would never ever win!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.