Author: margolies,marc
Date: 20:40:53 11/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
My status is that I am your respondent. Which apparently puts me at your level, alas. But I was discussing YOUR 'claim'(not 'our claim') with regards to its mischievious ends, not my opinion of its truth value. I suspect you are too mischievous to stay on topic. I don't want to disscuss your intelligence either, unless you are a chess engine. On November 03, 2003 at 19:59:04, James T. Walker wrote: >On November 03, 2003 at 15:14:02, margolies,marc wrote: > >>I am so sorry. >>Did we claim we are intelligent? >>Or rather, did you claim we were intelligent so that you could ridicule us >>because you believe you are even more intelligent than others? > >If you are not intelligent, then what is your status?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.