Author: David H. McClain
Date: 03:13:45 11/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
Tony, I have been one of the biggest critics here of SSDF for not having CM9000 listed in any way. You deserve much credit for attemping to rectify this whether by choice or not. You probably are not pleased with many of us for the criticism and any from me was certainly not intended to be a personal attack. There has also been criticism of testing CM9000 that is "not out of the box." Personally I don't think this is as important as not testing it at all. At the very least there will be some reference to the abilities of CM9000 as a base for others to continue testing their own settings and you will have enhanced the credibility of the SSDF list to where it has been in the past. Thank you. DHM
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.