Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 12:38:01 11/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 1998 at 19:11:11, Amir Ban wrote: >Oof ... > >It really seems like you don't get the issue here, so I will explain: > >There is an issue here that is between Ed and his customers. You post on it in a >way and style that, if a Rebel customer had the wrong impression that you are >representing the vendor, would probably make him very angry. And ? >Now you are >entitled to your opinion, but I'm concerned here that not every reader of this >newsgroup understands that you are not related to Ed, ?? I don't get this amir. Why do I have to explain that i am NOT related to rebel, and others don't have to explain that they are not related to xyz company ? Where is YOUR disclaimer for chessBase ? >or that people read some >things here without paying a lot of attention, and do not notice who wrote what, >or if they do notice, two weeks later they may mix things up and remember only >that someone, maybe Ed, yelled and snickered at them that they have to be >victims of his war with Chessbase. And ? If somebody is shallow, this is not my problem, or ? Put it in the charta Amir. people reading here don't have to be shallow. I am sure this will straighten the club. :-)) >I think Ed would not like that, because he depends on his customers for a >living, and needs to handle them with sensitivity. Ed always handles his customers very sensitive. But i am not ed. I don't have customers. I am my own. > Ok, maybe I worry too much, >but you worry too little. No. > A clear disclaimer that you are not the vendor is >needed in such a post. Pah - here in germany we don't write with disclaimers. Unbelievable. Which country is this where you post with disclaimers ? >>Do you have a disclaimer Amir ? >>"I am not objective to the topic/the vendor because I am in business with them" >>would be the fitting disclaimer for you, wouldn't it ? :-)) >This is an impertinent reply, but let's ignore this because you have a problem >in understanding the subject. Why is YOU asking ME for a disclaimer a polite and accurate request, and me asking YOU for a disclaimer an IMPERTINENT REPLY ? I don't get this, i thought 1 is 1. Now i see, 1 is different. Your one seems to be much better. Where can i order such a 1 ? >I'm not for or against anything, and the topic is irrelevant. I'm talking as the >moderator here and I'm worried about commercial interests (Ed's in this case). When you are talking as a moderator here, when beeing a normal member posting here, than you need a disclaimer or a message: i am saying this as a moderator. If you don't mark you words with a disclaimer or header, than you will cause misunderstandings. If you post this as a moderator (it looks you say you did) i am asking myself where in the charta is written that the moderator is saving commercial interests ? I thought this is a private club for private persons. >You know, some people actually make a living through their customers and this is >more than talk for them. Right. Looks like you know what you post, because you are not a private too. I will not and nowhere and never post with a disclaimer. This is idiotic. >Two months ago there was a similar thing when you started telling CSTal >customers to go jump in a lake. I was dumbfounded and considered deleting those >posts on the ground that they may damage Oxford business. I didn't then, because Nobody asks you to do what you do. You are not authorized to do so. >(1) I know that CSTal is not a serious business, and Oxford revenues come from >other products (2) You are connected to Chris and I was not sure that you are >NOT speaking for the vendor. Of course if a vendor wants to shout at his >customers that's his own business. it is not important what you know or not know amir. >>I am not interested in customers. I am a customer of my own. >> > >I know you are not interested, but other people are. If you are interested, do it. >>i see no problem in this relation. It was YOUR idea to use N-words. Please keep >>this in mind for later discussions. >I wrote this post as a moderator. I'm not debating or exchanging opinions with >you here. I see a problem in your choice of images, and ask you to choose a more >gentle style. Please keep this in mind if you want to continue being a member >here. > >Amir I have not used N-words. YOU related MY posts to posting in N-words. I will not discuss with you amir. If you want to throw me out. do it. but i will NOT discuss with you in the way you do it. your behaviour out of range. i do not accept your style.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.