Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Weirdness on the Playchess.com Server??

Author: margolies,marc

Date: 05:57:59 11/04/03

Go up one level in this thread


rolf, of course you are right. Perhaps the direction of my remarks were not
clear.
I was not called a cheat. I was told that I have many 'dubious' games and I
should 'watch out!' I stil do not know what to watch for, or any specific charge
like which games, etc.
My feeling is that If I do not report this to a larger community then we will
all feel this only happens to scoffs and cheats. I am not angry about it; I seek
a more open process of resolution.
As to whether play chess server is free, or supported by extensive software
purchases, I have probably bought more engines and used them more often and
played more internet chess there and elsewhere since playchess has been around.
(But there could be other reasons for that- Playchess arrived on the scene after
Sept 2001, and I live in New York-- our patterns of Chess Consumption here have
seriously changed and our greatest club-the Manhattan Chess Club-- is finished.)
Best Regards to you and thanks as always for answering me-Marc

.

On November 04, 2003 at 07:18:07, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>The so-called Fritz server is for free as you know. At least for the moment. I
>find messages very strange that always tell the same story. Someone has been
>accused of playing with computerprogram aid. Since 1996 I read such messages, so
>you see that this has nothing to do with this Fritz-Server in particular.
>
>Such messages itself are weird. Because you can't have both. You can't expect a
>detection system working perfectly. It will always react although the player did
>NOT use unallowed computer help. They will always miss someone who used the
>forbidden help. Do you think that it has something to do with any kind of
>payment?
>
>No, because many examples I've read came from players who played on ICC.
>
>However such complaints, also the one of Djordje, could be misunderstood as if
>professional admins could avoid such a mess. But it can't because the mistake
>lies in the software detection itself.
>
>There is only one solution. If you play online chess you'd better count in such
>cheatings. You should also be prepared to be accused for false reasons. Of
>course that also could be manipulated if a certain clique want to make you
>angry. That is all possible. But then. Did you ever play chess in a chess club?
>
>Rolf



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.