Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: qSearch and stand pat question

Author: Mridul Muralidharan

Date: 07:18:48 11/04/03

Go up one level in this thread


Hi,

In this specific position , proper evaluation that an unstoppable pawn duo at
seventh rank gets a high value should be sufficient.
But that is not the main problem - this would be the end result of a variation -
and if this position is not given the sufficient bonus it requires then it could
have bad instabilities.
example : even if the white rook is absent - still white is up - but definitely
by more than atleast 2 pawns here.
  This is indeed one of the problems that I faced ,and I did mention it in one
of my previous posts on blind dependence on stand-pat.
Since I also do "threatening moves" in qsearch - this is indeed an even major
problem for me.
I dont have a solution yet - though lot of hacks to get this reduced and in most
positions , eliminated : (like if previous was a threatening move , then see how
good the responses are before trying to see whether the standpat should be used
, etc).
But most of these have to be seriously contained , or they will blow up the
qsearch.
I hope you have tried out the idea of null-move in qsearch - I found it in the
CCC archives. Interesting idea - but was just too bad for mess. Maybe it will be
better for you.

The only decently generic way to eliminate this problem was better evaluation -
especially due to threats like hung / pinned pieces , king safety , etc.
But in this position , esp more for position with the modification that i
mentioned - i think it will be tough to get it right.


Regards
Mridul



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.