Author: Don Dailey
Date: 13:35:35 11/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 1998 at 14:31:09, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>IMO you simply give a guy like Garry Kasparov a re-match out of >>>respect. He asked for it so you give it to him. Shame on IBM! Note that's >>>some different than shame on Deep Blue. They did a fantastic job. > >>>- Ed - > > >>you really blew that response badly... based on one word: "respect". >>Why would IBM have any "respect" for Kasparov now? He called them >>cheaters at a press conference... Personally, my "respect" for Kasparov is >>down to zero, and still falling. I'd certainly consider Karpov, whom I have a >>*bunch* of respect for however... > >Sure Kasparov has a temper. He did badly. But that's not the point. I am >pointing at IBM one of the biggest companies on earth. > >They made the match a fantastic spectacle. Even now we are still talking >about the match all matches. They won and this shocked the chess world. > >It's against all chess etiquette not to honor the request of Kasparov for a >revenge match. I find this quite a humiliating treatment for the current >best chess player on earth. > >If Vishy Anand asks me for a re-match I say YES no matter if I am in >the mood for it or not. I say YES and I will make sure it will happen. >That is simply the price you have to pay when you have won. It's >an obligation based on chess etiquette. > >If you play against such giants then take the etiquette into account. >Anything else is showing no respect. In this light shame on IBM >lacking respect to world's best chess player and therefore also >a slap in the face to the whole chess community. IMO. > >About temper... Kasparov lost, Anand lost. Both by surprise. It wasn't >expected. We all have seen the face of Kasparov on television when >he lost. I have seen Anand's. It's their worst nightmare losing from a >computer. > >So let them steam off. It means nothing! IBM knows. I know. It's no >big deal. It's no excuse for IBM not to play again. > >- Ed - I have to second this comment. Respect is a funny word and does not necessarily mean "admiration." Being the best player in the world deserves respect. To me, respect is an acknowledgement of something. It might be as simply as nodding to a stranger as he passed by when he nods to you instead of ignoring him. But in this case it comes across as brash and tactless to essentially thumb your nose at him because you finally managed to barely beat him a SINGLE time. - Don
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.