Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Question for Ed about Bishop pair.

Author: Eelco de Groot

Date: 04:43:36 11/05/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 04, 2003 at 17:37:47, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On November 04, 2003 at 16:39:38, Eelco de Groot wrote:
>
>>Hello Ed, in case you are wandering by here in this forum, I had a "little"
>>question about Rebel's parameters? I was looking at the Ruffian - Rebel game
>>again and was wondering why actually Rebel wanted to play the move 11...Bf5.
>
>Hard to say, I feel not qualified enough to judge between 11..Bf5 and castling
>later and direct castling. What I can say Rebel played the tournament with
>experimental settings which weren't exactly the best.
>
>There will be an engine update soon (together with some bug-fixes) that after
>some times comes up with Jeroen's wished move but looking at the minor
>differences in score it is not very convincing :)
>
>My best,
>
>Ed
>

Hartstikke goed Ed! Pfff, I am really glad to hear that you can get some of the
difficulties fixed. To be honest I was afraid that too much of the code was
still assembler and that that can't be made compatible with all the protocols
that Windows has. Or something like that, and the datastucture of the EOC also
makes it more complex.  I see that Lex posted in the Lokasoft forum
http://www.lokasoft.nl/cgi-bin/UltraBoard1.61/UltraBoard.pl a way to disable the
use of the EOC if necessary.

About the Bf5 move again, maybe it is still an idea to test if with the new
version changing the [Bishop Pair] value now has more effect. I tried it with
the old Century 2.0 under ECTool again and in the regular Rebel.eng settings the
effect is more visible. At plydepth 11, with [Bishop Pair = 500] but for the
rest Rebel.eng settings, the score is 0.05 higher, 0.10 compared to 0.05, and
after 13.Bg5 only 13...f6 is played. (I called that TEST2.eng settings). The
effect seems enough to choose 0-0 earlier.

Now of course in Rebel 12 some parameters have increased values so this may mask
a more subtle change like increasing the value for the Bishop pair a bit. Not
all of the aggressive parameters are useful when it is still the opening phase,
and strategic principles are much harder to program than even King Safety. So if
Rebel now plays 11...0-0 with 0.41 score with your settings Ed I think is good!

Old Century 2.0:

Rebel Engine for ECTool. (c) Ed Schröder

Engine version   :  REBEL CENTURY 2
Rebel personality :  TEST2.eng [Bishop Pair = 500]
Opening book file :  RebelC.mvs
Hash table size  :  12 MB
Analysis mode   :  Analyzing next move
Refresh interval : 500 ms

Last Move : 11.Rxe4 (Black to play)

00:00  05.00  0.20  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.c4 bxc4 14.Qa4+
00:00  06.00  0.18  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 Be6 14.Bxe7 Nxe7
00:01  07.00  0.16  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 f6 14.Bd2 c5
00:02  08.00  0.14  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 Bg4 14.Bxe7 Nxe7 15.Qd3 Be6
00:07  09.00  0.18  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 f6 14.Bd2 Bg4 15.Re1 c5
00:12  10.00  0.15  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 f6 14.Bd2 O-O 15.a3 Re8 16.Nc3
00:23  11.00  0.12  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 f6 14.Bd2 O-O 15.Re1 Re8 16.Nc3
Nxc3 17.Bxc3
00:59  12.00  0.10  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 f6 14.Bd2 O-O 15.Re1 Qd7 16.a3
Rae8
03:06  12.08  0.12  11..O-O 12.Nc3 Bb7 13.Bd2 Nxd5 14.Re1 Re8 15.Nxd5 Bxd5
16.Ba5
06:01  13.00  0.14  11..O-O 12.Nc3 Bb7 13.Bd2 Nxd5 14.Re1 Re8 15.Nxd5 Bxd5
16.Ba5
20:18  14.00  0.20  11..O-O 12.Nc3 Bb7 13.Bd2 Nxd5 14.Re1 Re8 15.a4+
45:25  15.00  0.15  11..O-O 12.Nc3 Bb7 13.Bf4 Nxd5 14.Nxd5 Bxd5 15.Re3 Re8

Rebel Engine for ECTool. (c) Ed Schröder

Engine version   :  REBEL CENTURY 2
Rebel personality :  Rebel.eng
Opening book file :  RebelC.mvs
Hash table size  :  12 MB
Analysis mode   :  Analyzing next move
Refresh interval : 500 ms

Last Move : 11.Rxe4 (Black to play)

00:00  05.00  0.08  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.c4 bxc4 14.Qa4+
00:00  06.00  0.03  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.a4 bxa4 14.Rxa4 Be6
00:01  07.00  0.08  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.c4 bxc4 14.Qa4+ Bd7 15.Qxc4
00:02  08.00  0.04  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.a4 b4 14.c4 bxc3 15.Nxc3
00:10  09.00  0.07  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 Bg4 14.Bxe7 Nxe7 15.Re1 Be6
16.Nc3 c5
00:15  10.00  0.03  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 Bg4 14.Bxe7 Nxe7 15.Re4 f5 16.Re6
O-O
00:43  11.00  0.02  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 f6 14.Bd2 Bg4 15.Re1 c6 16.Nc3 f5
01:36  12.00  0.05  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 O-O 14.Bxe7 Nxe7 15.a4 Nd5
16.axb5 axb5 17.Rxa8 Qxa8 18.Qe1 c5
02:23  13.00  0.02  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 O-O 14.Bxe7 Nxe7 15.a4 Nd5
16.axb5 axb5 17.Rxa8
04:53  14.00  0.02  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 O-O 14.Bxe7 Nxe7 15.a4 Nd5
16.Nbd2 Qd7 17.Nh4
16:07  15.00  0.04  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 O-O 14.Bxe7 Nxe7 15.Nc3 b4 16.Ne4
Nd5 17.Ng3 Bg4
39:36  16.00  0.00  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 O-O 14.Bxe7 Nxe7 15.Nc3 Re8
29:38  16.01  0.03  11..Nxd5 12.Bg5 O-O
38:33  16.08  0.05  11..O-O 12.Nc3 Bb7 13.Bd2 Nxd5 14.Re1 Rb8 15.Nxd5 Bxd5
16.Ba5 b4

Ik ben weer lekker lastig maar had nog een dingetje: when testing or analyzing
overnight in Windows 98 (SE) on my computer I think I observed that the NPS can
go down after some time (hours) when the computer is left unattended. I thought
it might be some energy conservation matter of Windows 98 maybe. Nothing fatal
but maybe something to check? In Windows XP I read there is a Task Manager where
you can set the task priorities, but Windows 98 does not have such a feature.
(And I don't have Win XP) I will check to see if it happens always on my
computer, or check again with the patch when it's ready.

Thanks again Ed for all your programming (and bughunting)! Lex too!

 Groeten,
 Eelco



>=========================
>
>
> [Event "?"]
> [Site "?"]
> [Date "2003.11.04"]
> [White "?"]
> [Black "?"]
> [Result "*"]
>
> 1.Nf3 Nc6 2.e4 e5 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.Bd5
> Nxd5 9.exd5 Nb4 10.d4 e4 11.Rxe4
>
> r1bqk2r/2p1bppp/p2p4/1p1P4/1n1PR3/5N2/PPP2PPP/RNBQ2K1 b kq -
>
> 00:00:00   1.00  -0.57  11..O-O
> 00:00:00   1.04  -0.00  11..Nxd5
> 00:00:00   2.00  -0.13  11..Nxd5 12.Qe2
> 00:00:00   2.02  -0.13  11..Bf5
> 00:00:00   2.02  0.16  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5
> 00:00:00   3.00  0.16  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5
> 00:00:00   4.00  0.00  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Ng5
> 00:00:00   4.01  0.06  11..Nxd5 12.Ng5 O-O 13.Qh5
> 00:00:00   5.00  0.20  11..Nxd5 12.Nc3 Nxc3 13.bxc3 Bf5 14.Re1
> 00:00:00   5.01  0.20  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.c4 bxc4 14.Qa4
> 00:00:00   6.00  0.20  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.c4 bxc4 14.Qa4 Qd7
> 00:00:00   7.00  0.20  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.c4 bxc4 14.Qa4 Qd7 15.Qxc4
> 00:00:00   7.01  0.21  11..Nxd5 12.Ng5 Bf5 13.Re1 c6 14.Qf3 Qa5
> 00:00:01   8.00  0.16  11..Nxd5 12.Ng5 Nf6 13.Re1 h6 14.Qf3 d5 15.Nh3
> 00:00:01   8.01  0.20  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.c4 bxc4 14.Qa4 Qd7 15.Qxc4
> 00:00:01   9.00  0.32  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Qe1 c5 14.Bg5 Be6 15.Bxe7
>                        Nxe7
> 00:00:02  10.00  0.35  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Qe1 O-O 14.Nc3 Nxc3
>                        15.Qxc3 Bf6 16.Bf4 c5
> 00:00:04  11.00  0.37  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Nc3 Nxc3 14.bxc3 O-O
>                        15.d5 Bf6
> 00:00:07  12.00  0.36  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bd2 Bg4 14.Qe1 O-O 15.Nc3
>                        Nxc3 16.Rxe7 Be6
> 00:00:15  13.00  0.35  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bd2 O-O 14.Nc3 Be6 15.a4
>                        c5 16.axb5 Nxc3 17.Bxc3 axb5 18.Rxa8 Qxa8 19.Qd3
> 00:00:36  14.00  0.32  11..Bf5 12.Re2 Nxd5 13.Bg5 f6 14.Bd2 O-O 15.Re1
>                        Qd7 16.Nc3 Nxc3 17.Bxc3 d5 18.Ba5
> 00:01:38  14.01  0.32  11..Nxd5 12.Bg5 O-O 13.Bxe7 Nxe7 14.Re1 Nd5
>                        15.Qd3 Bb7 16.Nbd2 f5
> 00:01:48  14.07  0.34  11..O-O 12.Nc3 Bb7 13.Re1 Nxd5 14.Nxd5 Bxd5
>                        15.Bf4 Bf6 16.Qd3 Bxf3 17.gxf3 Bg5
> 00:02:19  15.00  0.39  11..O-O 12.Nc3 Bb7 13.Re1 Nxd5 14.Nxd5 Bxd5
>                        15.Qd3 f5 16.Bf4
> 00:04:06  16.00  0.41  11..O-O 12.Nc3 Bb7 13.Re1 Nxd5 14.Nxd5 Bxd5
>                        15.Qd3 Bf6 16.a4 Re8 17.Rxe8
>============



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.