Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 10:12:43 11/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2003 at 08:13:33, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On November 05, 2003 at 06:44:47, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On November 04, 2003 at 06:29:38, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>>
>>>On November 04, 2003 at 05:33:30, Daniel Clausen wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 04, 2003 at 05:19:52, Tony Hedlund wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>This setup will not be in the list. It was my own initiativ
>>>>>to do this. We have now discussed it and we will test CM9000
>>>>>with its own GUI and book.
>>>>
>>>>IMHO a great decision of the SSDF! Hurray! :)
>>>>
>>>>Sargon
>>>
>>>yes indeed.
>>>I do appreciate this much.
>>>
>>>we can only thank them for doing it. no matter how or in which setting.
>>>johans engine deserves to be tested. it is very strong and this makes the
>>>topic IMO so important.
>>>
>>>This way i develop into a ssdf-fan :-))
>>
>> Hi Thorsten
>> I can't understand your point of view. You were the
>> first to test Rebel 12 not using the original settings :-)
>> Kurt
>
>I don't understand why you don't understand my point of view.
>there was no irony in my statement.
>
>I do appreciate that the ssdf test Chessmaster, no matter which style
>nor which GUI (although i see no reason to test it in CB GUI's).
Hi Thorsten
Your statement contributes to clarify things. I thought
you had something against testing the SKR-settings instead
of the default engine.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.