Author: James T. Walker
Date: 06:10:21 11/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2003 at 01:25:26, margolies,marc wrote: >I suppose that i am more logical than I am intelligent. For instance, i am still >wondering if you are giving me the 'conditional' bug off or the 'unconditional' >bug off.... >If you don't want to take responsibility for the taunting predicate of your >post, that's fine. But it can't give you the authority to persuade others. >BTW no one bickered except you. Tony Hedlund and SSDF came around to our >position while you were still back biting me. >Please turn your 'Ponder' to on and read some of the posts here as well as >writing them. > > I have not asked for nor assumed any authority of any kind. I simple expressed my opinion which I am entitled to do here. If you have a problem with that then take it up with the moderators. I'm happy that the SSDF will test Chessmaster 9000 as it is sold. I was never against that. I only pointed out that there was a lot of whining about the way they were testing TheKing engine. I also pointed out that it's the SSDF perogative to test it any way they wish. TheKing engine with the "SKR" settings is thought by many here to be one of the best setups. I'm personally interested in it's rating with the General.ctg book. If you found my subject line "taunting" that's fine. It was meant to be. Jim >On November 05, 2003 at 09:09:18, James T. Walker wrote: > >>I will ask you again. Do you claim to be unintelligent? If so the post does >>not apply to you so bug off. If so it applies to you if you were one of the >>people complaining/bickering about the way SSDF is testing TheKing engine. I >>expressed my opinion on the way it was being tested by SSDF. Again, if you have >>a problem with the subject line, then that's your problem. You seem to be the >>only one. Too Bad. >>Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.