Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 19:44:43 11/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2003 at 19:24:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: >First question: are you running the _same_ test Eugene ran? If not, >comparisons mean little. Originally I just ran the bench command. If I change the pawn hash size as he did, it runs slower on my machine (1,281,173 nps), which results in about a 52% increase, not 59%. I don't have Crafty 19.5, and 19.3 doesn't display the output of the bench command like Eugene's post does. I just get dots. So I don't know if it's searching the same positions or not. Is there a way to turn that on? Or is that something new in 19.4 or 19.5? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Crafty v19.3 (1 cpus) White(1): hashp 1m pawn hash table memory = 768K bytes. White(1): hashp 8m pawn hash table memory = 6M bytes. White(1): bench Running benchmark. . . ...... Total nodes: 62777490 Raw nodes per second: 1281173 Total elapsed time: 49 SMP time-to-ply measurement: 13.061224 White(1): bench Running benchmark. . . ...... Total nodes: 62777490 Raw nodes per second: 1281173 Total elapsed time: 49 SMP time-to-ply measurement: 13.061224 White(1):
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.