Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:54:28 11/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2003 at 06:43:35, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 08, 2003 at 06:34:14, Peter Berger wrote: > >>This is the second match in (planned at least ;) ) a little series between >>modern middle-class amateur engines and old professionals. >>(Movei- Genius 2 1-6, 1 draw). >> >>Chess System Tal 2.03 played on a PIV2.2GHz, 180MB Hash, 3+4 men tablebases. >>Movei played on a PIV1.8GHz, 16MB Hash. It used a slightly updated book provided >>by Uri and the s parameter. >> >>Time control was game in half an hour. >> >>Looking at the games Movei did much better than in its first match against >>Genius. Many games were open, interesting battles. >>I might repeat this match latter with switched hardware, I have no clear idea >>about the real strength difference between both. >> >>Chess System Tal's aggressive booklearner was partly successful here against >>Movei's narrow book. > >I will send you the best tested version by another tester version 112. > >I did not know when you plan to play a match and I thought based on your posts >that you plan first to report results of Genius against yace. > >Uri Note that I do not think that there is a big difference in playing strength between 112 and 110 but a beta tester got better result with 112 relative to 94 that is the same as the previous version that you tested and it was not the case with 110(110 performed even worse than 94 but the results were not statistically significant). There were not played enough games with 110 to get significant results and the tester already stop testing 110 because it was not important for me to know if 110 is better than 94 and it was enough for me to know that 112 is better than the best tested version that was 94. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.