Author: Cliff Sears
Date: 05:13:18 11/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
I forgot which engine I tried on Arena took nine before switching but one of them did. On November 10, 2003 at 06:29:52, scott farrell wrote: >On November 10, 2003 at 04:50:04, martin fierz wrote: > >it takes my java chompster 8 plies to fail ow on QxH5 and chose QD5. > >Scott > >>On November 10, 2003 at 02:40:46, scott farrell wrote: >> >>>On November 09, 2003 at 20:57:35, Cliff Sears wrote: >>> >>>So what is the correct move, and what did Novag play that was a blunder? >> >>i don't know what the novag played, but i'm pretty certain it was Qxh5? instead >>of Qd5. >> >>cheers >> martin >> >> >>>>Interesting position on how engines can look much deeper today. >>>> >>>>This position was from a game by >>>>Novag Monster Y vs.Daniel King in 1985 (from his book Kasparov v Deeper Blue) >>>> >>>> >>>>[d] 1q3bk1/R4pp1/5r2/5Q1p/1p4n1/5BP1/1PP4P/6BK w - - 0 1 >>>> >>>>Many engines still byte on this early in their analysis but generally see the >>>>correct position after D9
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.