Author: Amir Ban
Date: 00:42:58 11/12/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 1998 at 19:55:02, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 11, 1998 at 07:09:43, Amir Ban wrote: > >>On November 10, 1998 at 08:16:23, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>> >>>this is dead wrong. It overlooked a draw in game two that *kasparov* also >>>overlooked. But when it played Be4 rather than Qb6, the move that Kasparov >>>insisted won a pawn, it turns out that DB had seen a *very* deep draw there, >>>one that Kasparov also overlooked. >>> >> >>Don't know where this interesting but false piece of information comes from. >>Deep Blue evaluated 37.Qb6 as +32 so it didn't see a draw, if there is indeed >>one to see here. >> >>Amir > >Is this not the move where it chose to go into "panic time" because the eval >kept dropping iteration by iteration, and it changed to Be4 at the last minute? > That was move 36 (axb5). I posted the printout information here once. It contains answers to all these questions. I assume you didn't save it. Since you comment on this matter often, and with an air of authority, aren't you at all interested in the only data ever published on this ? >There is definitely a draw to be found... just let Junior search... for a day or >so. You'll get 0.00 eventually. I did... And I assume they did as well to >change to something else... Don't know, but if DB didn't see a draw, what does this matter ? I have an email from F.Friedel from May 97 saying he ran this on Fritz 4.01 to ply 17 and got +0.28. Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.