Author: mike schoonover
Date: 17:39:59 11/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2003 at 15:59:36, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >I think that you know that Russian players, be they IMs or GMs, in the 2550 ELO >ballpark, are tactically the best in the world. The positions you quoted are >way too simple for a good Russian player. Shaposnikov a cheater? No way... at >least in my opinion. Ask any serious GM what chess school is supposed to be the >best of all, especially in tactics? > >The Knight to f5 is "easy" to see as it frees the black Bishop diagonal and >enables Black to eventually open up the g-file... The other example was not very >clear to me. What is so special about 1.f4? Why was it difficult to find? > >The whole thing sounds quite muddled to me, I must say. I would like to hear >more evidence. > >Djordje hi Djordje, coincedently i was just sitting down to relax, randomly checking posts and going over the first game in chess informent #2. bronstejn v flesch,Szombathely. using winboard with ruffian105 for analysis i was amazed at how many moves ruffian choose that where also the choice in the game. some times very many in a row. to say that a human strong in tactics is copying fritz is a compliment and not necessaraly proof of any thing. just grab a informent your your favorite book of games and peruze them with your pet engine. in games between strong gms good software picks there move quite often. regards mike
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.