Author: Mike Hood
Date: 03:16:13 11/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2003 at 04:55:56, stuart taylor wrote: >On November 11, 2003 at 04:07:38, ERIQ wrote: > >>Let's vote :) > >But a different subject. And my vote is that Fisherandom IS very interesting and >important for computer testing because it tests the computers innate >understanding of openings, rather than preprogrammed things. >In fact I think that there could be nothing better for testing true strength of >computer program, and I am very interested in this discussion. > >S.Taylor Just my opinion: I personally am not interested in Fischer Random Chess, Shuffle Chess, Chinese Chess or any variation apart from classical chess. I've never played a single game of FRC, neither on the board nor on the computer, and I doubt I ever will. However, I respect the rights of anyone to have an interest in variant forms of chess. Posts on this subject are definitely on-topic in this forum, and everybody should feel free to contribute or not contribute in such threads without having to be attacked by extremists on either side.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.