Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: What's wrong with the Commentary on Chess FM?

Author: Matthew White

Date: 15:27:36 11/11/03

Go up one level in this thread

On November 11, 2003 at 18:02:45, Dan Sicerly wrote:

>These guys were sickening, here we have a Guy claiming to be a Grandmaster
>repeatly claim Fritz was lost and that kasparov simply had to mop up the
>position, is this guy a joke or what? All the While My fritz8 analysis never had
>itself down more then 0.60?

I think that Kasparov had some inaccuracy towards the end of the game, analysis
will tell, but Hiarcs9 had the game over +1 for white at several points...

• Re: What's wrong with the Commentary on Chess FM? Ziad Haddad 16:18:18 11/11/03
  • Re: What's wrong with the Commentary on Chess FM? Deepak Nityanandam 20:54:48 11/11/03
• Re: What's wrong with the Commentary on Chess FM? Terry McCracken 15:49:47 11/11/03
• Re: What's wrong with the Commentary on Chess FM? Dan Sicerly 15:39:30 11/11/03
  • Re: What's wrong with the Commentary on Chess FM? Matthew White 15:45:22 11/11/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.