Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What's wrong with the Commentary on Chess FM?

Author: Matthew White

Date: 15:45:22 11/11/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 11, 2003 at 18:39:30, Dan Sicerly wrote:

>On November 11, 2003 at 18:27:36, Matthew White wrote:
>
>>On November 11, 2003 at 18:02:45, Dan Sicerly wrote:
>>
>>>These guys were sickening, here we have a Guy claiming to be a Grandmaster
>>>repeatly claim Fritz was lost and that kasparov simply had to mop up the
>>>position, is this guy a joke or what? All the While My fritz8 analysis never had
>>>itself down more then 0.60?
>>
>>I think that Kasparov had some inaccuracy towards the end of the game, analysis
>>will tell, but Hiarcs9 had the game over +1 for white at several points...
>
>
>That's the problem with Hiarcs and Shredder they have overly optimistic
>evaluations.
Maybe. The reason that the claims were probably made on Chess.fm is that Fedo
may not have realized how difficult it would have been to win for white when he
said it... On ESPN2, Maurice Ashley was talking about white having a clear
advantage, then he realized that a win would be EXTREMELY difficult to come
by...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.