Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What's wrong with the Commentary on Chess FM?

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 15:49:47 11/11/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 11, 2003 at 18:27:36, Matthew White wrote:

>On November 11, 2003 at 18:02:45, Dan Sicerly wrote:
>
>>These guys were sickening, here we have a Guy claiming to be a Grandmaster
>>repeatly claim Fritz was lost and that kasparov simply had to mop up the
>>position, is this guy a joke or what? All the While My fritz8 analysis never had
>>itself down more then 0.60?
>
>I think that Kasparov had some inaccuracy towards the end of the game, analysis
>will tell, but Hiarcs9 had the game over +1 for white at several points...

Yes, Kasparov had a small advantage through most of the game but let it slowly
slip away. I never saw myself, any way to win for White, and well neither did
Kasparov. If he kept playing his very best, he may have found a win, but it
would have taken many hours and he would be too drained.

I don't think the X3D is a good idea, if you want to win! Bet he had a
headache!?

Hey, but good PR for both X3D Technolgies, and ChessBase....everyone wins, well
almost;-)

Hell, they all get paid!

Kasparov winning the match is now below 40% IMO. I will not try and predict the
outcome.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.