Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 16:53:55 11/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2003 at 06:45:16, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On November 11, 2003 at 04:04:39, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>Both moves are based on simple tactics. The amount of time spent on the moves >>misrepresents the context i.e. it is very possible shap found these moves in his >>analysis in the prior 2 or 3 moves. I think that assuming he found these moves >>just before he actually played them is pure BS. > >As experienced player with ~2200 ELO you should know that IMs/GMs rarely analyze >in blitz games. How could someone rated below FIDE 2300 POSSIBLY know what goes on in the mind of GMs????? Bob D. >It's all about human intuition and experience. >Most probably he knew that pattern and found the idea immediately when he saw >the position on the board. Maybe immediately after he played the forced g6. > >GM Knaak suggested to disqualify those players due to "clear cheating" after >"careful analysis". >I don't know where he exactly saw a clear evidence of computer assistance. > >It was pure speculation on my part. > >Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.