Author: Stefano Gemma
Date: 23:31:23 11/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2003 at 01:14:06, Jouni Uski wrote: >It seems, that endgame and tablebases are not so important at all! 90-95% of >games are decided before endgame phase. Agreed? If my memory don't fail only >one of Kramnik - Fritz games was lost unnecessary in endphase for Fritz... >In comp - comp games endgame is much more important, I think. >Jouni I think that it is more important for humans who want to beat programs. It's hard to beat a program on tactical issue, so the better thing to do could be to prepare the endgame since the opening. This could be done for grand-masters or very good players... not me ;-). A move that give us a little chance in the endgame, can not to be seen by the program, for horizon problems or lacks in its evaluation function. The same could happens for program vs program, when the evaluation function of one of the two take care of some endgame trips that the other one doesn't know. Ciao!!! Stefano Gemma
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.