Author: Dan Sicerly
Date: 01:13:12 11/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2003 at 03:59:42, Harald Faber wrote: >On November 12, 2003 at 03:21:46, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 12, 2003 at 03:16:44, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 12, 2003 at 02:11:04, Derek Paquette wrote: >>> >>>>I'm reading through all these posts and watched the games, and something >>>>occurred to me, especially what the CEO of chessbase said, that kasparov was >>>>sent the versions of x3d fritz as they were created...so... >>>> >>>>If chessbase were able to clone kasparov use him, study him, poke holes in his >>>>game, analyse him for hundreds of hours, how well would they do? >>>> >>>>But thats a question we'll never be able to answer, but how about this , >>>> >>>>If they sent x3d version fritz with the same hardware to a large super >>>>grandmaster tournament, a round robin, where all the players not only had to >>>>prepare for the computer, but other humans, how would it fair? >>>> >>>>I think we are seriously under estimating this beast... >>>>just my opinion of course. >>>>-Derek >>> >>>This is exactly what chessbase want you to believe. >>> >>>I think that all these matches are unimportant matches and it may be better if >>>we ignore them. >>> >>>I do not trust the humans in these match to try to win the matches and I suspect >>>that they believe that draw can give them more money. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I can add that the fact that kasparov got another match after drawing with Fritz >>when Smirin never got another match after beating the machines increase my >>impression(hardware was slower against smirin but time control was also faster >>and the second factor is something that is supposed to help the machines so I >>think that smirin's result is better than kasparov's result and kramnik's >>result). >> >>Players may believe that it is better if they do not win because if they draw >>they have better chances to get another match. >> >>Uri > > >What I always say. Let the programs play regular matches and tournaments and you >will see FMs, IMs and GMs adjust their play vs. computers and win. You are not as bright as i thought you were to make such a Rediculous Statement, surely you realize that most if not all professional players regulary, play and analyze with fritz, there simply is no adjustment that can be made where a FM can defeat fritz in a match, if there was the greatest player in the history of the game would be imploying this strategy now.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.