Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Winboard vs Uci

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 14:48:44 11/12/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 12, 2003 at 16:38:09, Frank Quisinsky wrote:

>>Also, for some reason Arena takes way too much time to communicate with the
>>engines (or maybe it's some other problem). If I run a game between two programs
>>at 1/0 time control, it will somtimes take 4 minutes for that game to finish.
>>That's either inefficient communication with the engines or Arena isn't really
>>giving each engine 1 minute per game. Winboard is really good about this from my
>>experience.
>>
>>Arena does have some nice features though, but I would prefer thoughtful
>>implementations of very basic things (IE not a popup window if I make an illegal
>>move) rather than 100 great features implemented in a less than optimal way.
>
>Hi,
>
>good message!
>Maybe you have interst to add your message in our support forum.
>More easy if we have such messages in our forum, so the once programmer of Arena
>must not searching in his free time for bug message in all the different chess
>fora.
>
>Thanks for your understanding!

Frank, I already have mentioned this over there, Martin's reply was that some
engines needed a little extra time so he put in some do-nothing loops(!!).

http://www.f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/messages/25740.htm

I find that annoying as hell to be honest and if it is not needed in winboard it
shouldn't be needed in Arena.

But Arena is still a very cool GUI and I don't want to make demands or annoy
Martin, I'm definitely grateful for the great work he has been doing :)

-S.
>Best
>Frank



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.