Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Move ordering metric

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 07:13:34 11/13/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 13, 2003 at 09:44:22, Daniel Clausen wrote:

>On November 12, 2003 at 18:40:32, Peter Kappler wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>>>I get an average of better than 90%. It takes tuning. Work on killers and
>>>history pays off. Make sure you search bad captures before other moves also.
>>>Taking capture out of killers gave me a boost also.
>>>
>>
>>Hmmm, I think I do bad captures at the end, and as I recall it was a clear win.
>
>IIRC, for most people trying bad captures at the end was better with SEE, but
>worse with MVV/LVA.
>
>Sargon

How do you know that a capture is bad with MVV/LVA?
If you have bad captures then it means that you have some way to evaluate them
as bad captures(MVV/LVA does not give you that information).

You may not have SEE but you need to define bad capture and without knowing the
definition this discussion is meaningless.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.