Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Move ordering metric

Author: Daniel Clausen

Date: 07:53:22 11/13/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 13, 2003 at 10:13:34, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 13, 2003 at 09:44:22, Daniel Clausen wrote:
>
>>On November 12, 2003 at 18:40:32, Peter Kappler wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>>>I get an average of better than 90%. It takes tuning. Work on killers and
>>>>history pays off. Make sure you search bad captures before other moves also.
>>>>Taking capture out of killers gave me a boost also.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Hmmm, I think I do bad captures at the end, and as I recall it was a clear win.
>>
>>IIRC, for most people trying bad captures at the end was better with SEE, but
>>worse with MVV/LVA.
>>
>>Sargon
>
>How do you know that a capture is bad with MVV/LVA?

When someone uses SEE, a capture is bad when the SEE-value for it is negative.
When someone uses MVV/LVA, a capture is bad when the MVV/LVA-value for it is
negative.

It's that simple. :)

Sargon



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.