Author: steven blincoe
Date: 19:18:00 11/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
What a noble purpose! It seems to me that in itself earns him the right >to sit in that chair aside from his obvious gift for the game. whatever Kasparov has done for chess has nothing to do with nobility it has to do with money..his money whatever he could make for himself regardless of the consequences not that that there is anything wrong with making money from his ability but noble? was taking back the knight move against Judit ..noble? the entire Grandmaster's association fiasco ..noble? his getting back into bed with the the president of Fide(a murderer)noble? his berating of the brilliany prize judges (after awarding the brilliancy prize to a game he lost)noble? his accusing the Deep Blue team of cheating(a view he still holds to this day)..noble?? his demanding to start a game over during a recent simul (because the player was rated higher then the maximum rating for the simul participants)..noble? i can go on and on... i dont even think Kasparov himself would consider himself to be a noble person
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.