Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:54:00 11/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2003 at 04:40:53, Andre van Ark wrote: >On November 14, 2003 at 02:40:15, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On November 14, 2003 at 02:31:40, Andre van Ark wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>Yes, it is true Vincent could analyse this games quite well. >>> >>>But he is banned..... >>> >>>Mainly because he called a certain person "an old idiot" >>> >>>And some people like to throw with nud on Vincent, even while he isn't able to >>>defend himself. >>> >>>Who should be banned ? >>> >>>Kind regards >>>André van Ark >> >>Either you haven't been here that long, or you just haven't read his previous >>posts. I would bet my ex-wife and a bag of chips that Vincent would indeed state >>that Kaspy played like a 2000 rated patzer. It has happened time and time again. >>In fact here is a few tells from channel 64 on ICC during the first game: >> >>Diep(C)(64): i am only here for a few minutes. this game is of no interest to >>me. >>Diep(C)(64): playing a weak opening vs a computer is stupid >>Diep(C)(64): already i can see it will be draw >>Diep(C)(64): diep can draw this blindfolded >> >>As you can see Diep should be in this match rather than Fritz... >> >>Peter > >Hi Peter, > >Uhhhmm you may keep your ex-wife but the bag of chips is welcome. :-D > >All I can say ( I am a 1875 elo patzer) that Vincent is right. All I can see is that he is arrogant and only likes to criticize other people. > >"Diep(C)(64): playing a weak opening vs a computer is stupid >>Diep(C)(64): already i can see it will be draw >>Diep(C)(64): diep can draw this blindfolded" > >As the game has showed Vincent statements are OK. Or do I oversee something? > >Btw. Diep doesn't take the pawn on f2 in the first gane. So what? Kasparov could play differently against Diep and go to position that Diep blunders and Fritz does not blunder. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.