Author: steven blincoe
Date: 05:02:04 11/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
> >But you haven't included any of his great achievments, and the list is very >long! > >BTW no one becomes as _great_ as Kasparov, if they didn't _love_ the game! > >Yes money plays a role, it does for _all_ GM's and IM's but to be the best, >money alone can't get you there, that's a fact! love of game,being great,dedication ,etc,etc has nothing to do with his being noble the man is not noble,not even close and yes ,i could go on and on,siting more examples of his boorish ,less then generous,poor loser behaviour , because the record of his less then noble actions is about as long as the list of his chess victories > >Is your "Weeds" and "Thorns" analysis noble? > >No, it's not! no its certainly not noble, but i do not claim that my comments about Kasparov are noble..they are only the truth. his noble actions were actually sited as reason alone for his deserving to play Fritz yet again i think not.. Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.