Author: martin fierz
Date: 07:34:52 11/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2003 at 08:28:42, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On November 14, 2003 at 05:08:17, martin fierz wrote: > >>On November 14, 2003 at 04:31:21, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>On November 14, 2003 at 02:20:35, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>> >>>>If the 3D glasses are bothering him that much, all he has to do is close his >>>>eyes and play blindfold. If he wants, every once in awhile he can take a peak as >>>>needed. It's not that big a deal for a player at his level to play blindfold. >>>> >>>>I see no reason to be making excuses for GK. He managed his time poorly and paid >>>>the just price. >>>> >>>>Next game! >>> >>>I agree deeply with you, since the board is also clearly visualized internally >>>at those mastery levels, so the 3d external representation is quite unimportant. >>> >>>w.b.r. >>>Otello >> >>just look at those amber blindfold/rapid tournaments, compare the level in >>blindfold and non-blindfold chess and then reconsider your statement... >> >>cheers >> martin > >What I meant is that a major part of the chess game is alwas played "blindfold" >by grandmasters, so the real pieces and chessboard is a mere mnemonic auxilium >at those levels of mastery. > >w.b.r. >Otello if that is so, then why do they play so much better with the board? your theory isn't too convincing... cheers martin
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.