Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 08:13:23 11/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2003 at 08:05:58, Jay Kleinman wrote: >On November 13, 2003 at 23:34:30, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>Game 2 was not a Kingsindian. It was a Ruy Lopez. > >Which quickly transposed into a Kings Indian. > >Jay It was a classical King's Indian pawn structure, not a King's Indian. You might call that nit-picking but it isn't. I see no logical way how to get to a similar position via the King's Indian move order. The b1 knight is usually on c3 and both light squared bishops are still on the board. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.