Author: Wayne Lowrance
Date: 08:37:37 11/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2003 at 07:26:08, Andre van Ark wrote: >On November 14, 2003 at 07:06:00, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 14, 2003 at 06:58:00, Andre van Ark wrote: >> >>>On November 14, 2003 at 05:54:00, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On November 14, 2003 at 04:40:53, Andre van Ark wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 14, 2003 at 02:40:15, Peter Skinner wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 14, 2003 at 02:31:40, Andre van Ark wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Yes, it is true Vincent could analyse this games quite well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>But he is banned..... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Mainly because he called a certain person "an old idiot" >>>>>>> >>>>>>>And some people like to throw with nud on Vincent, even while he isn't able to >>>>>>>defend himself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Who should be banned ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Kind regards >>>>>>>André van Ark >>>>>> >>>>>>Either you haven't been here that long, or you just haven't read his previous >>>>>>posts. I would bet my ex-wife and a bag of chips that Vincent would indeed state >>>>>>that Kaspy played like a 2000 rated patzer. It has happened time and time again. >>>>>>In fact here is a few tells from channel 64 on ICC during the first game: >>>>>> >>>>>>Diep(C)(64): i am only here for a few minutes. this game is of no interest to >>>>>>me. >>>>>>Diep(C)(64): playing a weak opening vs a computer is stupid >>>>>>Diep(C)(64): already i can see it will be draw >>>>>>Diep(C)(64): diep can draw this blindfolded >>>>>> >>>>>>As you can see Diep should be in this match rather than Fritz... >>>>>> >>>>>>Peter >>>>> >>>>>Hi Peter, >>>>> >>>>>Uhhhmm you may keep your ex-wife but the bag of chips is welcome. :-D >>>>> >>>>>All I can say ( I am a 1875 elo patzer) that Vincent is right. >>>> >>>>All I can see is that he is arrogant and only likes to criticize other people. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Diep(C)(64): playing a weak opening vs a computer is stupid >>>>>>Diep(C)(64): already i can see it will be draw >>>>>>Diep(C)(64): diep can draw this blindfolded" >>>>> >>>>>As the game has showed Vincent statements are OK. Or do I oversee something? >>>>> >>>>>Btw. Diep doesn't take the pawn on f2 in the first gane. >>>> >>>>So what? >>>> >>>>Kasparov could play differently against Diep and go to position that Diep >>>>blunders and Fritz does not blunder. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>Yes, everythingh is possible but the thread is about that it is a SHAME that >>>Vincent has been banned. And is indeed a pity that Vincent isn't able to give >>>free comment on the game Kaspy-Fritz. >>> >>>That's all. >>> >>>André >> >>I do not agree. >>Vincent was banned because he attacked other people and the moderators were >>right. >> >>Uri > >Hi Uri, > >"he attacked other people" > >Okay, that is true, it is known that Vincent isn't very subtle ;) > >But the "attacked" people were able to defend themselves. And now Vincent can't. >Because he is b....d. > >Imho, the moderators should ban persons who attacks somebody who can't defend >himself. > >André I'll be danged, I was wondering what happened to Vincent. Moderators shame on you. His contributions here were important. People like Bob were doing better than even with the barbs with him. I got on Bob several times about it advising him to nock it off, being a University professor. Wayne
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.