Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 09:03:02 11/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2003 at 08:05:58, Jay Kleinman wrote: >On November 13, 2003 at 23:34:30, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>Game 2 was not a Kingsindian. It was a Ruy Lopez. > >Which quickly transposed into a Kings Indian. It had a similar pawn formation. So what? You want to conclude that KID is not good against computers based on a game black lost due to a stupid blunder, while having a superior position? > >Jay
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.