Author: Mark Young
Date: 12:29:43 11/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2003 at 14:03:55, Frank Nelson wrote: >Yesterday in my post "What's Kaspy up to?" I mentioned that it seems in my view >that the King's Indian is not a viable defense in gm tournament or match. The >reason I gave was the Bayonet Attack. My post was made four hours before TH >match. I feel though that in amateur chess at least to master level you may get >away with it with the exception being your opponent knows how to kill your black >King with the Bayonet Attack. My heart goes out to Kasparov though. His loss >yesterday left me in a mess emotionally and psychological. I still have not >recovered fully from game two. It is my desire to see Kasparov redeem hisself >and us in game three. > >cordially yours, Frank Nelson I don't understand the point of this post. They did not play the King's Indian. It was a Ruy, that turned into a King's Indian structure, but the Bayonet Attack was not even an option in the opening.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.