Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 14:17:32 11/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 13, 2003 at 21:57:12, K. Burcham wrote: >I wish Vincent were here so that we could get accurate analysis of Fritz vs >Kasparov game. Vincent would also have accurate opinions on whether Kasparov was >trying to win. Oh well maybe when he gets back, he will share his ideas with us >on this man vs machine match. Why do you think Vincent, the king of blowing things out of proportion in computer chess, would give us accurate analysis of anything? He tells PhDs that they are frauds, falsely accuses people of cheating, claims his program is the best in the world, consistently displays his lack of understanding of certain computer chess programming topics and makes wild claims based upon those false "facts", consistently claims that something is "impossible" if he can't do it, and so on. Why would you take anything he says as accurate?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.