Author: jefkaan
Date: 03:14:36 11/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 13, 2003 at 21:57:12, K. Burcham wrote: >I wish Vincent were here so that we could get accurate analysis of Fritz vs >Kasparov game. ok i will comment these games then myself in his style; "its clear now that Kasparov has become an old man who cannot play chess anymore; he also may have been bribed by chessbase (and/or they have chosen him instead of Anand as he nowadays makes patzer blunders which i wouldnt not even make in a simultaneous blindfolded rapid match against 150 Gm's). In game one Kasparov could have easily won if he wouldnt gave away his bishop by taken the knight on e4 and giving away the pawn on a2. If he had simply put his king into safety by playing Kc1b1 which always is good when castling long as any child knows which plays chess longer than one month than he could have won the endgame easily as computers cannot play endgames except DIEP. In game 2 he played way to risky by advancing his king pawns, again neglecting kingsafety, whereas he could have easily stopped the simple and lousy queenside pawnstorm by Fritz so its obvious Fritz still has no positional knowledge as no-one in chessbase can play chess and Kasparov is playing suicide chess instead of normal chess probably because of some bucks which had been offered him by chessbase and/or xd3chess as it would make excellent publicity if computers would win again from a human like in the case of the DeepBlue fraud by IBM" are you happy now ? :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.