Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 14:38:48 11/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 2003 at 17:29:57, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On November 15, 2003 at 16:18:51, Dimitris Poulos wrote: > >>Kasparov will score 33%. >>Since they can't bit Shredder, they demonstrate that their software is >>human-oriented. This is business and has nothing to do with chess. >>I would like to see Radjabov in five years against these toys. >> > >I see clearly, that these toys now, would beat Radjabov convincingly. >In five years they would beat him easily. > Chess programs don't play "human chess" so all humans say they are stupid, >don't know chess etc..., but the truth is we are thinking in a human way >so we can't believe that computers have dominated chess with this strange and >wrong(not human) game. They can beat the 99,9999986163% of the human population that plays chess of course so the ratio is 99,9986163%, >and only 100-200 people can resist and lose and only 7-8 people can really >resist. So who is better in chess? It may seem ridiculous to define that computers are better if they beat the 50% at least, of the human population and not if they beat the top 100-200 humans and perhaps it is. But i think they beat the top 100-200, ecxept 7-8 top players or some top anti-comp players.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.