Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:16:46 11/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 2003 at 19:33:10, Dan Andersson wrote:
>On November 14, 2003 at 14:10:11, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>The trap was suggested by a poster in the israeli chess forum.
>>Kasparov could play 31...Rf6 and the question is if Fritz could avoid 32.Qxb7
>>
>>[Event "?"]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "?"]
>>[Round "-"]
>>[White "?"]
>>[Black "?"]
>>[Result "*"]
>>
>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. d3 d6 5. c3 g6 6. O-O Bg7 7. Nbd2 O-O 8.
>>Re1 Re8 9. d4
>>{
>>White last book move
>>}
>>9... Bd7 10. d5 Ne7 11. Bxd7 Nxd7 12. a4 h6 13. a5 a6 14. b4 f5 15. c4 Nf6
>>16. Bb2 Qd7 17. Rb1 g5 18. exf5 Qxf5 19. Nf1 Qh7 20. N3d2 Nf5 21. Ne4 Nxe4
>>22. Rxe4 h5 23. Qd3 Rf8 24. Rbe1 Rf7 25. R1e2 g4 26. Qb3 Raf8 27. c5 Qg6
>>28. cxd6 cxd6 29. b5 axb5 30. Qxb5 Bh6 31. Qb6 Rf6 32. Qxb7 Ne3 33. R4xe3
>>Bxe3 34. Nxe3 Qd3 35. Bxe5 Qxe2 36. Bxf6 Rxf6 37. Qc8+ Kg7
>>*
>>
>>
>>Note that yace does not fall into that trap and prefers 32.Qc7 but my Fritz
>>likes Qxb7 inspite of seeing nagative score for that move.
>>
>>analysis on A1000
>>
>>
>>[D]5rk1/1p6/1Q1p1rqb/P2Ppn1p/4R1p1/8/1B2RPPP/5NK1 w - - 0 1
>>
> Problem with such subtle moves is that they might be answered by enigmatic
>replies. One of my engines suggested 32. Qc7 and it in its turn sets up a
>counter defence it claims.
>
>MvH Dan Andersson
32.Qc7 is only a defence and not a problem for black.
black can reply 32...Bg5 and white still cannot capture b7 when black plans
Ne7 and Qf7.
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.