Author: Angrim
Date: 15:26:22 11/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2003 at 13:20:37, Stephen A. Boak wrote: >If you do not examine *all* the move possibilities, how can you ever say you >*solved* chess by a pruning method that ignores certain moves & followups. Because you may be able to prove that the moves that you ignored were irrelevant to the proof. The obvious example is that if you know one of the moves from a position wins, there is no need to examine any of the other moves from that position. Angrim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.