Author: Bob Bachman
Date: 22:07:16 11/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 2003 at 20:37:01, Carlos Lantigua wrote: >I think so. I think too this "match" is fixed. Why GK didnt play anticomputer >chess since the begining of the match?. >Why did fritz take so long to response 1.Nb3? >Why black made that silly bishop move to e7? >Is obvious GK signed a clause stating this match end in a 2-2 tie, thus the >fritz programmmer and GK hardcore fans be happy. >I laugh of those who still think this is a serious match. The conspiracy theory does not look good. 1)GK makes a stupid move in Game 2 and looks like an idiot 2)Computer plays to its weakness in Game 3 and looks like an idiot Conspiracy theories do not work that way. I do not dare ask you what you think of a certain chess champion circa the early 1970's. Bob
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.