Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 01:15:23 11/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2003 at 01:07:16, Bob Bachman wrote: >On November 16, 2003 at 20:37:01, Carlos Lantigua wrote: > >>I think so. I think too this "match" is fixed. Why GK didnt play anticomputer >>chess since the begining of the match?. >>Why did fritz take so long to response 1.Nb3? >>Why black made that silly bishop move to e7? >>Is obvious GK signed a clause stating this match end in a 2-2 tie, thus the >>fritz programmmer and GK hardcore fans be happy. >>I laugh of those who still think this is a serious match. > >The conspiracy theory does not look good. > >1)GK makes a stupid move in Game 2 and looks like an idiot >2)Computer plays to its weakness in Game 3 and looks like an idiot > >Conspiracy theories do not work that way. I do not dare ask you what you think >of a certain chess champion circa the early 1970's. > >Bob Ah, you got it wrong: 1)GK makes a stupid move in Game 2 and looks like an idiot, using X3D technology 2) X3D glasses look like the most stupid thing to use 3) Fritz misteriously looses game 3 and 4, Human with X3D glasses looking superior 4) Kasparov will say at the end X3D is useful, sponsor is happy Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.