Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 06:24:40 11/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2003 at 08:48:30, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 17, 2003 at 07:40:46, martin fierz wrote: > >>On November 17, 2003 at 04:51:55, Daniel Clausen wrote: >> >>>On November 17, 2003 at 04:20:42, martin fierz wrote: >>> >>>[snip] >>> >>>>the real question should be: why do programs like fritz play these closed >>>>positions worse than any 2000 player? fritz' programmers surely know about >>>>those weaknesses, why have they never been addressed? with a whole team of >>>>professionals working on it... >>> >>>Because it won't give you anything for the SSDF rating list? >>> >>>It probably takes much more work than just a few if-statements here and there, >>>so if you're not committed to playing against humans, it probably won't happen >>>that fast. >> >>it probably also takes much more than just a few if-statements here and there >>for fritz to be the engine it is now :-) >>and since frans morsch has claimed to have been optimizing against human play >>over the last year (lame excuse for no progress or something else?), he should >>definitely have addressed this issue. > >It is obviously a lame excuse as the last game proved. >I guess that Fritz did not get better because the programmer is tired of working >about it. > >It happened to Richard Lang and now it seems to happen to Frans morsch. > >Uri Do you know any chess program that has solved the problems of long term planning in closed position? Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.