Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:39:20 11/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2003 at 18:02:13, Peter Berger wrote: Hello Peter, thank you for your comments. >Movei's rating looks a bit optimistic to me. yes. i will correct this. >Some suggestions for further entries, mostly oldies ( no idea if they support >autoplayer for most of them): >Virtual Chess II, Genius 2 (_really_ old, won't finish on one of the two last >ranks though I bet, one beer ;) ? ), MChess 7.1 ( I suspect some bugs with MCP 8 >currently) and Yace of course. I thought to use a genius version. but in the tournaments before using genius was really not a very surprising or cool thing. it was clear the program was too weak. I don't beliebe that version 2 would bring much new point of views. i have a version 6.5. that should be better. but - as i said. genius is really nothing that makes me dream ... Virtual II ? I thought there is a version 3 in the pipe. But nothing so far. thats really annoying and disapointing. i would prefer to use version 3. Mchess7.1 ? I think 8 is better. and there are MANY 8 versions. I am sure Andreas Wutzke could give me advise to use the right 8 settings. there a really many experimental versions. And Marty is still interested in computerchess. yes, maybe mchess8 would be something enjoyable for all of us. i will ask andreas about his best versions. >In case you want to have another wild card >amateur entry you could try PostModernist - I think you might like it. PostModernist. OK- i will consider about this. >Best amateur missing might be Aristarch, that doesn't seem to play in many user >tournaments. aristarch ?! aha. ok - i will see what i read about the program. >When it is about professionals the strongest one missing is probably Gandalf. > >Peter yes. ok - i will reconsider everything.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.