Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 22:48:13 11/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2003 at 18:08:03, Amir Ban wrote: >On November 17, 2003 at 11:56:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >> >> >>Thanks for replying, I still think that at move 20...f5 was not too late to >>save the game! >> >>Jorge > >Too late ? You must be joking. Black could play it any time in the next 15 >moves. > >I don't understand this fixation on f5. What's wrong with any other pawn advance >? Black can play h5, g5, f5, and take it from there, any time during the game. >What is white going to do about it ? > f5-f4 attack e3, just like a4-5-6 are needed for white to attack b7. Isn't this what Nimzowitch learned us. g5 could be needed for playing f4 but isn't any goal in itself. Else I was a bit unhappy, not because of Fritz's play but because of all wrong computeranalysis under the game. If they go wrong in such a basic structure that is maybe the most common in human-human games, then there isn't much help in using them as an analyze helper either. Odd Gunnar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.