Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: At move 20...f5 was not too late to save the game !

Author: martin fierz

Date: 02:38:08 11/18/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 17, 2003 at 18:08:03, Amir Ban wrote:

[snip]

>I don't understand this fixation on f5. What's wrong with any other pawn advance
>? Black can play h5, g5, f5, and take it from there, any time during the game.
>What is white going to do about it ?

the point is you want to play f5-f4-fxe3 and invade on the f-file. if you can do
this for free, you will have a good position.
whether or not to move the other pawns, and which, is a different question. e.g.
on f5/g5 white can play g3 and that might be a bit annoying since you are
opening lines against your king. another idea is to first push h5 with the
intention h4 to stop g3 forever and then shoot your f-pawn forward. in the
french winawer, white often first fixes black's pawn structure with h5 for this
reason. then you have to take h4 into account of course.

i guess it's either h5-h4 first or a direct advance with the f-pawn. in any case
you want to make the move first which threatens something directly, so you
should not play first Kh8 and then g5 or so - rather first f5 or h5 which force
white to take some action on the kingside or suffer the consequences.

>I think this game was a low swindle by Kasparov. He played a dubious line based
>on preparation that showed Fritz will not punish him for it. He gave Fritz about
>20 free tempi (5 moves to capture the pawn, 5 to disentangle, 5 to move his king
>and 5 to break).

then again, fritz needs about 10 tempi by this count to get it's attack on the
kingside going. you can call this a low swindle if you like. but isn't this what
human-comp matches are about? you guys have forgotten to put some knowledge into
your programs and the GM takes advantage of it - possibly even making the
computer look like a complete fool?
i would also add that GM sutovsky seemed to like white's pawn-snatching on ICC,
while GM yermolinsky didn't like it. so there is no clear GM opinion of whether
this was really bad, meaning it's certainly not just a "low swindle".

cheers
  martin



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.