Author: jefkaan
Date: 10:03:38 11/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2003 at 16:36:18, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >Fritz didn't look "that bad". well, although 5 ..a6 wasnt that bad, i think 7 ..a5 wasnt good; any *good* book would have preferred 7.. g6 (and 7.. Ne4 maybe also would have been possible); known moves, played eg. in 1997 against Horvath (2525). The problem with the Fritz book is maybe that if a move doesnt get an ! or an ?, all other moves are equal, or just based on simple statistics; not a way to defeat someone like Kasparov.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.